Release standard

Quality, provenance, and licensing stay attached

Treat temporal integrity, lineage, and commercial authority as release data instead of footnotes.

Synthetic schema sampleObservation → action → next state
01
00.000sObservergb.player_view
02
00.050sActmove.forward + camera.delta
03
00.100sTransitionpose.x +0.84 m
04
00.150sOutcomeprogress 0.31 → 0.36

The values are synthetic and illustrate the public specification. They are not measurements from a commercial dataset.

Direct answer

A production dataset should disclose what was collected, how it changed, which checks passed, who authorized each use, and how affected material can be withdrawn.

Quality is multidimensional

One pass flag hides too much. Technical integrity, temporal synchronization, semantic validity, coverage, privacy, rights eligibility, and release approval should be recorded separately.

A failed in-game task can be valuable training data. A successful task can still fail release because its action stream is missing or rights remain unresolved.

Provenance survives transformation

Each released artifact should resolve to source capture, checksums, transformation code, parameters, collection context, and review decision.

Immutable lineage makes a bad transformation reproducible and a withdrawal targeted. Without it, every derivative becomes suspect.

Rights review fails closed

Discovered content is not releasable inventory. Records move through quarantine, rights review, approval or rejection, ingestion, release, and withdrawal.

The registry should cover allowed uses, redistribution, customer access, territory, duration, attribution, restrictions, and the evidence supporting each decision.

  • No commercial claim based only on download access
  • No silent mixing of first-party and third-party material
  • No license string without source-level provenance
  • No release when required authority remains unknown

Questions this page should settle

Does a public download permit commercial training?

Not necessarily. Availability and granted rights are separate questions, and underlying content can carry additional restrictions.

What provenance should a buyer receive?

The release should trace files to source capture, transformations, checksums, environment version, rights evidence, and review status.

How are failed quality checks handled?

Checks remain visible and scoped. Material that fails a release-critical requirement is excluded or quarantined rather than silently repaired.

Bring us the training target.

We will map it to the observations, actions, state, outcomes, rights, and delivery evidence the dataset must contain.

Request access